The Ultimate PCB Design Software Comparison.Comparing the Top 5 PCB CAD Programs.PCB design you need a CAD program for your project, but which is best There are already tons of articles like this available and theyll all bore you to death with the same mundane details with the exception of a select few.Our ultimate PCB design software comparison guide will crush all those articles.Heres why. Were going to run through a step by step tutorial of the same design to show how each critical feature grades out in the top PCB programs available.Our unique guide begins by diving into a comprehensive comparison of the top 5 PCB design tools.Activate the peak of your engineering efficiency with Altium Designer, the electrical engineers 1 choice for PCB design software.Zuken, one of the leading companies in the EDA and ECADCAE industry, offers a wide range of software solutions and consulting services for endtoend electrical and.And our tutorial will compare the best 3 in our humble opinions.Jump to a section.Software Overviews.Step by step Tutorials.Free 3D Pcb Design Software' title='Free 3D Pcb Design Software' />Introduction to PCB Design Software.There are several programs available that range from simple and intuitive to highly sophisticated.They range from free or inexpensive to high endpremium.MurtonPike Systems pcbcad51 pcb design software.Touch screen compatible.Fully supported product sent by first class recorded post.Windows version of.D-design-software-free-download.jpg' alt='Free 3D Pcb Design Software' title='Free 3D Pcb Design Software' />They come feature less or feature heavy. Dvd Creator Software For Windows 8 here. All of the tools are different and unique in their own way.PCB-Main_4.png' alt='Free 3D Pcb Design Software' title='Free 3D Pcb Design Software' />Ultimately, your needs and preferences should drive what CAD program you use.This guide is structured to help you decide which is optimal or explore alternatives.The Cadence solution reduces our PCB development time by 80 percent Gisbert Thomke, Group Leader, IBM RD Lab.Grading Criteria.Its important to establish the criteria were using which is, inevitably, subjective.We also have biases for software that were extremely comfortable with compared to programs that we have had very little work with.We really like this excerpt from Mathieu Stephans AKA limpkinexcellent Altium vs.Cadence article to encompass our primary grading criteria.A PCB routing software should be easy to use.To define that subjective criteria, Id like to propose here a simple easiness measurement metric defined as number of clicks number of keystrokes mouse moving distance to perform a given function.Why Well because a good portion of the time you spend routing your PCB time is money is the time taken to perform simple actions.When you have to click 5 times, move the mouse 5cm to the right and 4cm to the left to do a simple thing, and you have to do this simple thing one hundred times on your PCB.In addition to Mr.Stephans easiness metric, the software should be a standard and widely used platform in the industry.This is important for team collaboration when the engineers skills are scaled to larger, wide spread applications.Finally, we consider the various feature sets and which programs are better for which applications.Youll find that most programs have all the features youre looking for, so the ease of use factor is most strongly considered.Keep in mind that everyone will have a different preference so our opinions may not align with your needs and ultimate favorite.Other Articles The San Francisco Circuits Advantage.Whichever PCB design software you select, reference our PCB School for additional electronic design tips.Optimizing PCB Interconnects through Trusted Design Principles.Component Selection, Testing Protocol Common Errors.And, when your design is ready for a prototype or production run, get in touch with us at San Francisco Circuits to bridge your concept with reality.Successfully taking a complex PCB design from layout to PCB assembly is the core value that comes from partnering with San Francisco Circuits for your next project from flex PCB to bare circuit boards, we are your one stop shop for advanced printed circuit technologies.PCB Comparison Reference.The table below summarizes the key points of each program and a basic grade of each critical feature.CategoryCriteria.Ideal for hobbyists, professionals, everyone.Price Range. Learning Curve.Grade A F. SupportHelpTutorials.Grade A F. User InterfaceNavigation.Grade A F. Personalization Options.Grade A F. CategoryCriteria.Schematic Editor.Placing and editing components.Grade A F. Placing and editing electrical objects wire, ports, etc.Grade A F. Placing and editing graphical objects.Grade A F. Annotation.Grade A FOverall Schematic Editor.CCBBBGrade A F. CategoryCriteria.Schematic Library Editor.Adding pins and component shape.Grade A F. Defining connection type and descriptions.Grade A F. Multi part schematic component.Grade A F. Integration with PCB footprint and PCB library.Grade A F. Adding simulation properties.Grade A FOverall Schematic Library Editor.BCCCAGrade A F. CategoryCriteria.PCB Library Editor.Defining and placing pads.Grade A F. Customirregular shapes.Grade A F. 3. D visual.Grade A F. Defining other layers around footprint silkscreen, keepout, solder mask, courtyard, etc.Grade A FOverall PCB Library Editor.BCBBAGrade A F. CategoryCriteria.Other Criteria. Database Management.Grade A F. PCB Routing.Grade A F. Net Management.Grade A F. 3. D Visualization.Grade A F. Error Debugging.Grade A F. RF Design.Grade A F. FPGA Design.Grade A F. File Generation.Grade A F. These costs vary widely so we quoted a simple, single license that allows for small to medium sizecomplexity designs with no special add ons or features.Does not include maintenancerenewal discounts but just first year purchase.All grades are for basic, comparable feature sets, meaning that a PCB program will not score any higher because it has more features available, and the ones they have in common are the focus of the grade.Dip. Trace Basics.Dip. Trace is one of the most affordable and simple programs available, ideal for hobbyists but less suitable for professionals or complex schematics.If youre looking for something basic to get a 2 4 layer board made and some thru hole or bulky surface mount components or are just starting out, Dip.Trace is a good start.Its very intuitive with a low learning curve, but is limited in ability.Dip. Trace has a free version which is limited by 3.More complex designs will likely need to upgrade to the unlimited version priced at 8.Dip. Trace features include.Schematic capture with components linked to a library, an electrical rule check, and some importingexporting functionality to trade files between other CAD programs.PCB layout with a project menu linking the library, schematic, PCB, and a pattern editor, drag n drop placement, fanout for BGAs and such, and an auto router that works fairly well.It also has some 3.D features if you decide to use STEP files.A decent library editor that allows creation of patterns, schematic components, PCB footprints, and even 3.D models. Good support and tutorials available.Its popular enough that if you have a question, chances are someone else had the same question and it can be looked up in an online forum.The Dip. Trace Verdict.Overall, Dip. Trace is pretty good for smaller, simpler boards and is very easy to learn.Its a good starter CAD that will teach you board design skills that can be applied to more advanced CAD programs.For anything more than just whipping up simple PCBs for hobbyprototype projects, youll need to upgrade or look for something with more capabilities.John Teel, a prominent electrical engineer and founder of Predictable Designs, has first rate review of Dip.Trace, Altium, Eagle and Or.CAD. To illustrate how much personal preference factors in the software, John ultimately favors Dip.Trace over the other programs and provides a solid write up of the platform.John also shared a point of view with us regarding our conclusion that we feel is important to share.I disagree with your summary that Dip.Trace is only good for simple designs.I have done some very complicated designs using Dip.Trace. This includes designs using high pin count application processors, BGA parts, and products with as many as 5 different kinds of wireless radios.With the full version there is no limit on the pin count.My biggest complaint about Dip.Trace is that its not very common.If you need to work with other PCB designers then something like Altium or Eagle is a better choice.He has a point and our lack of familiarity with Dip.Trace surely played a part in our final verdict.Eagle CAD Basics.If youre looking for something a little more complete but still low cost and easy to use, Eagle CAD is a good choice.Its one of the most popular CAD programs used and has tons of support from various forums and online communities.Theres also an abundance of good You.Tube videos for tutorials.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |